翅片结构对超汽化结构换热性能影响的研究

doi:10.16568/j.0254-6086.201901008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于计算流体动力学软件ANSYS CFX，利用非均相流欧拉-欧拉模型耦合RPI(伦斯勒理工大学)沸腾模型开展超汽化冷却结构的过冷沸腾两相流模拟，比较不同翅片结构对超汽化结构换热性能的影响。研究发现在高热流量条件下三角形翅片结构的换热性能优于矩形翅片结构：其中顺流4×3 三角形翅片结构总体换热性能最好；矩形4×3 翅片结构受流速影响较大，由于翅片的阻碍作用使得流速越来越低，换热性能越来越差；逆流4×3 三角形翅片结构由于其翅片间的腔小，并且逆流翅片对主流的破坏使得腔内流体保持着很大的湍度，所以翅片区有很好的换热性能，但由于逆流翅片对流体阻碍作用大，小槽内流体速度越来越低，使得远离翅片区的侧边换热性能逐渐变差。

关键词: 偏滤器, 翅片结构, 高热流量, 超汽化, 计算流体动力学

Abstract:

Based on the computational fluid dynamic code ANSYS CFX, the inhomogeneous Eulerian- Eulerian multiphase model coupled with RPI (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) boiling model is adopted to simulate the subcooled boiling two-phase flow of hypervapotron structure, and the effects of different fin structures on the heat transfer performance of hypervapotron structures are compared. The results show that under high heat flux conditions, the heat transfer performance of the triangular fin structure is better than the rectangular fin structure. Triangular 4×3 to the flow geometry has the best heat transfer performance. Rectangular 4×3 geometry is greatly affected by the flow rate due to the obstruction of the fins making the flow rate to be lower and the heat transfer performance will be getting worse. Triangular 4×3 against the flow geometry make the fluid in the cavity to maintain a large degree of turbulence due to the small cavity between the fins and the adverse effects of counter-flow fins on the mainstream, so the fin area has a good heat transfer performance, but due to the impeding effect of the counter-flow fin on the fluid, the fluid velocity in the slot is getting lower and lower, as the result, the heat transfer performance on the sidewall far away from the fin area is getting worse.

Key words: Divertor, Fin structure, High heat flux, Hypervapotron, Computational fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

TL62+6

刘琦1，毛世峰*1，王忠伟2，刘旭峰2，叶民友1, 2. 翅片结构对超汽化结构换热性能影响的研究[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2019, 39(1): 48-54.

LIU Qi, MAO Shi-feng, WANG Zhong-wei, LIU Xu-feng, YE Min-you. Study on the effect of fin structure on heat transfer performance of hypervapotron structure[J]. NUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS, 2019, 39(1): 48-54.

参考文献

[1] Ibbott C, Chiocchio S, D’Agata E, et al. Overview of the engineering design of the ITER divertor[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2001, 56–57: 243–248.
[2] Chang S H, Baek W. Understanding, predicting and enhancing critical heat flux[C]. Proceedings of the 10th international topical meeting on nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics (NURETH-10), Seoul, Korea, October 5–9,2003.
[3] Schlosser J, Escourbiac F, Merola M, et al. Thermal hydraulic testing for ITER high heat flux components[C].Fusion Technology 1998, Proc. of the 20th SOFT,Marseille, 1998. 137−140.
[4] Tivey R, Akiba M, Driemeyer D, et al. ITER R&D:vacuum vessel and in-vessel components: divertor cassette[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2001, 55:219–229.
[5] Falter H D, Thompson E. Performance of hypervapotron beam stopping elements in JET[J]. Fusion Technology, 1996, 29: 584–595.
[6] Milnes J, Ciric D, Forner M, et al. Hypervapotron design for the long pulse upgrade on MAST NBI[C].Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, San Diego, USA, October 14–17,2003. 478–481.
[7] Escourbiac F, Bobin-Vastra I, Kuznetsov V, et al. A mature industrial solution for ITER divertor plasma facing components: hypervapotron cooling concept adapted to Tore Supra flat tile technology [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2005, 75–79: 387–390.
[8] Escourbiac F, Schlosser J, Merola M, et al. Experimental optimisation of a hypervapotron concept for ITER plasma facing components[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2003, 66–68: 301–304.
[9] Falter H D, Deschamps G H, Hemsworth R S, et al. Test of divertor elements, JET divisional note[R].JET-DN-C(91)93.
[10] Massmann P, Falter H D, Deschamps G H. Test of a narrow channel vapotron (4mm fins, 3mm water channel),JET divisional note[R]. JET-DN-C(91)96.
[11] Milnes J, Drikakis D. Qualitative assessment of RANS models for hypervapotron flow and heat transfer[J].Fusion Engineering and Design, 2009, 84: 1305–1312.
[12] Domalapally P, Dellabiancia M. Thermal-hydraulic design of water cooled first wall of the fusion reactor under DEMO conditions[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2017, 124: 311–315.
[13] 才来中, 蔡立君, 刘翔, 等. 钨偏滤器的单元结构设计以及相关实验研究[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2016,36(2): 97−103.
[14] Ezato K, Suzuki S, Sato K, et al. Critical heat flux test on saw-toothed fin duct under one-sided heating conditions[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2001, 56–57:291–295.
[15] Wang Z W, Song Y T, Huang S H. Design of the hypervapotron module for the EAST device[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2012, 87: 868–871.
[16] 储德林, 潘保国, 梅洛勤, 等. 聚变堆高热流部件超汽化换热实验研究[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2015,35(3): 253−258.
[17] Wilcox D C. Turbulence modeling for CFD[M].California: DCW Industries Inc, 1993.
[18] Kurul N, Podowski M Z. On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels[C]. ANS Proc. 27th National Heat Transfer Conference,Minneapolis, MN, July 28−31, 1991.
[19] Ranz W E, Marshall W R, Evaporation from drops[J].Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48(3): 141−146.
[20] ANSYS CFX. User manual, ANSYS[M]. Inc,Canonsburg, PA, 2012.
[21] Milnes J. Computational modelling of the hypervapotron cooling technique for nuclear fusion applications[D]. England: Cranfield University, 2010.
[22] Lemmert M, Chawla J M. Influence of flow velocity on surface boiling heattransfer coefficient [C]. Heat Transfer and Boiling, Academic Press, 1977.
[23] Tolubinski V I, Kostanchuk D M. Vapour bubbles growth rate and heat transferintensity at subcooled water boiling[C]. Proceedings for the 4th International Heat Transfer Conference, Paris, France, 1970.
[24] Cole R, Rohsenow W M. Correlation of bubble departure diameter for boiling of saturated liquid [J]. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 1969, 65(92):211–213.
[25] Kurul N, Podowski M Z. On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels[C]. ANS Proc. 27th National Heat Transfer Conference,Minneapolis, MN, July 28−31, 1991.
[26] Anglart H, Nylund O. CFD application to prediction of void distribution in two phase bubbly flows in rod bundles[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1996, 163:81–98.