CFETR水冷包层第一壁模块中等离子体注入氚输运有限单元分析

doi:10.16568/j.0254-6086.201704015

核聚变与等离子体物理 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 457-464.DOI: 10.16568/j.0254-6086.201704015

CFETR水冷包层第一壁模块中等离子体注入氚输运有限单元分析

劳鼎宇, 黄凯, 陈磊, 刘松林

(1. 中国科学院等离子体物理研究所，合肥 230031；2. 中国科学技术大学，合肥 230026)

收稿日期:2016-09-26 修回日期:2017-05-17 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2017-12-15
作者简介:劳鼎宇(1991–)，男，浙江绍兴人，硕士研究生，从事核能与核技术工程研究。
基金资助:
国家磁约束核聚变能发展研究专项(2013GB108004，2015GB108002)；中国科学院等离子体物理研究所基金项目(DSJJ-14-GC05)

Finite element analysis on plasma-driven transport of tritium in FW of WCCB for CFETR

LAO Ding-yu, HUANG Kai, CHEN Lei, LIU Song-lin

(1. Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031; 2. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026)

Received:2016-09-26 Revised:2017-05-17 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2017-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用多物理场计算程序COMSOL Multiphysics，构建了一维氚输运有限单元模型，并与文献中氢同位素在钨中的滞留实验数据进行模拟验证。基于经过校验的一维模型，并考虑Soret效应，对中国聚变工程实验堆(CFETR)水冷包层第一壁进行了二维氚分析计算。模拟结果表明，氚在单个典型包层第一壁中的总滞留量为0.12mg，进入冷却剂中的总渗透量为0.12mg•yr^-1。若不考虑Soret效应，氚在RAFM钢中的滞留量将增加8.80%，渗透到冷却剂的量增加65.97%。由此可见，Soret效应对于氚的渗透和滞留具有显著的意义。

关键词: 中国聚变工程实验堆, 滞留, 渗透, 有限单元方法, Soret效应

Abstract:

Based on the finite element method (FEM), a one-dimensional tritium transport model is set up using COMSOL multiphysics. The model is benchmarked against literature results of hydrogen isotope retention in tungsten. Then a two-dimensional FW model of WCCB for China fusion engineering test reactor (CFETR) is built to analyze the transport of tritium, taking Soret effect into account. The simulation results show that for a single typical blanket, total tritium retention in FW is 0.12mg, and the permeation amount into the coolant is 0.12mg•yr^-1. The retention in RAFM steel will increase by 8.80% while permeation to the coolant by 65.97% when the Soret effect is neglected. Therefore, the Soret effect is significant for the permeation and retention of tritium.

Key words: CFETR, Retention, Permeation, FEM, Soret effect

中图分类号:

劳鼎宇, 黄凯, 陈磊, 刘松林. CFETR水冷包层第一壁模块中等离子体注入氚输运有限单元分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2017, 37(4): 457-464.

LAO Ding-yu, HUANG Kai, CHEN Lei, LIU Song-lin. Finite element analysis on plasma-driven transport of tritium in FW of WCCB for CFETR[J]. NUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS, 2017, 37(4): 457-464.

参考文献

[1] Ogorodnikova O, Fütterer M. Calculations of the tritium re-emission rate in the DEMO first wall [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1999, 270(3): 368–371.

[2] Farabolini W, Ciampichetti A, et al. Tritium control modelling for a helium cooled lithium-lead blanket of a fusion power reactor [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2006, 81:753–762.

[3] Nakamura H, Sakurai S. Case study on tritium inventory in the fusion DEMO plant at JAERI [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2006, 81: 1339–1345.

[4] 宋勇, 黄群英, 吴宜灿. ITER中国液态锂铅实验包层模块第一壁等离子体注入氚滞留分析 [J]. 核科学与工程, 2008, 28: 263–267.

[5] Pick M A, Sonnenberg K. A model for atomic hydrogen- metal interactions application to recycling, recombination and permeation [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1985, 131(2-3): 208-222.

[6] Anderl R, Holland D, Longhurst G, et al. Deuterium transport and trapping in polycrystalline tungsten [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 1992, 21: 745–52.

[7] Gervasini G, Reiter F. Tritium-material interaction in various first wall materials [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1988, 155–157(2): 754–759.

[8] Longhurst G, Holland D, Jones J, et al. TMAP4 User's Manual [R]. EG and G Idaho, Inc., United States, 1992.

[9] Pisarev A, Ogorodnikova O, Titkov M. Plasma driven tritium uptake and leakage through plasma facing materials [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 1998, 41: 103–109.

[10] Ying A, Liu H, Abdou M. Analysis of Tritium/Deuterium Retention and Permeation in FW/Divertor Including Geometric and Temperature Operating Features [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2013, 64: 303–308.

[11] 蒋国强, 罗德礼, 陆光达. 氚和氚的工程技术 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2008.

[12] Eckstein W. The binary collision model [M]. Computer Simulation of Ion-Solid Interactions: Springer, 1991. 4–32.

[13] Jiang Kecheng, Ma Xuebin, Cheng Xiaoman, et al. Thermal-hydraulic analysis on the whole module of water cooled ceramic breeder blanket for CFETR [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2016, 112: 81–88.

[14] Eu BC. Thermodynamics of irreversible processes [M]. Springer Netherlands, 1998.

[15] Doyle B, Brice D. Steady state hydrogen transport in solids [J]. Radiation effects, 1985, 89: 21–48.

[16] Longhurst GR. The soret effect and its implications for fusion reactors [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1985, 131: 61–69.

[17] Serra E, Perujo A, Benamati G. Influence of traps on the deuterium behaviour in the low activation martensitic steels F82H and Batman [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1997, 245: 108–114.

CFETR水冷包层第一壁模块中等离子体注入氚输运有限单元分析

Finite element analysis on plasma-driven transport of tritium in FW of WCCB for CFETR

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邵利华, 刘泽康, 栗再新. 聚变堆氚迁移分析程序 JD-CF 的设计与验证[J]. 核工业西南物理研究院, 2024, 44(4): 483-490.
[2]	龚正, 韩松博, 倪小军, 葛剑, 黄建军, 于斌, 高翔, 孙金鑫, . CFETR 真空室结构稳定性的有限元分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2023, 43(1): 38-42.
[3]	钟云珂, 陈鑫, 朱根良, 杨恩朋, 付猷昆, 蔡立君, 李强 . CFETR 25kW 4.5K 氦制冷机 RAMI 初步分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2023, 43(1): 55-61.
[4]	侯炳林, 赖小强, 许婉韵, 魏海鸿. CFETR 磁体支撑初步概念设计 [J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(4): 399-403.
[5]	孙金鑫, 倪小军, 葛剑, 韩松博, 龚正. 等离子体大破裂工况下CFETR真空室的电磁结构耦合分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(3): 308-313.
[6]	陆野, 杨锦宏, 桂腾, 任珍珍, 刘胜, 宁洪伟, 徐敬坤, 宋强, 邓海飞, 汪卫华. CFETR电流爬升阶段中性束注入伏秒数分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(3): 354-360.
[7]	赵自强, 栗再新, 曹启祥. CFETR氦冷包层放射性废物包装容器的屏蔽设计[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(2): 175-181.
[8]	魏辉翔, 李仁杰, 李成, 徐壮, 王文善. CFETR极向场磁体馈线系统线圈终端盒初步设计与分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(1): 51-55.
[9]	杨宇晴1，秦成明*2，赵燕平2，杨桦2. CFETR螺旋波行波天线的仿真设计与分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2021, 41(2): 138-142.
[10]	王开松, 杨皓, 徐坤 . CFETR 水冷包层电磁结构耦合分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2021, 41(1): 45-50.
[11]	俞志伟1, 2，陆坤1，葛剑1，倪小军1. 不同位形大破裂工况下CFETR 真空室预研件的电磁载荷分析 [J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2020, 40(3): 227-232.
[12]	胡俊，喻彬，姜飞，邓立，张志*. 中国聚变工程实验堆涉氚阀门技术现状[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2020, 40(2): 182-187.
[13]	王俊，王晓宇. 中国聚变工程实验堆启动氚投料量与氚平衡分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2020, 40(1): 34-39.
[14]	张兵1, 2，赵雪丽1, 2，马学斌3, 4，刘松林1. 水冷陶瓷增殖剂包层氚输运分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2019, 39(4): 301-308.
[15]	朱紫阳1，叶民友1，毛世峰*1，刘旭峰2. 基于参数化模型的内冷屏设计优化流程的开发[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2019, 39(3): 256-264.