欢迎访问《核聚变与等离子体物理》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

核聚变与等离子体物理 ›› 2009, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 146-151.

• 核聚变工程技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

ITER纵场磁体重力支撑的两种初步更改设计方案

侯炳林,潘传红,李鹏远,张年满   

  1. (核工业西南物理研究院,成都 610041)
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-07 修回日期:2008-12-10 出版日期:2009-06-15 发布日期:2010-05-24
  • 作者简介:侯炳林(1972-),男,四川省安岳县人,高级工程师,主要从事聚变装置结构设计与分析工作。

Two preliminary alternative designs for the gravity support of ITER toridal field magnet

HOU  Bing-lin, PAN  Chuan-hong, LI  Peng-yuan, ZHANG  Nian-man   

  1. (Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu 610041)
  • Received:2008-04-07 Revised:2008-12-10 Online:2009-06-15 Published:2010-05-24

摘要: 由于原参考设计的ITER纵场磁体重力支撑座的真空电子束焊接难度,对支撑座进行了两种方案的更改设计。将支撑座部件从中间剖分成相等两半的“一分为二电子束焊接方案”设计以及取消焊接工艺的“螺栓夹紧方案”设计。用解析法和有限元法对这两种设计进行了屈曲分析,它们都有足够的安全裕度,表明这两种方案都可行。通过对这两种方案的比较,由于“螺栓夹紧方案”制造简单、废品率低、极大地降低制造费用、生产周期缩短,建议采用“螺栓夹紧方案”。

关键词: ITER重力支撑, 更改设计, 真空电子束焊接, 螺栓夹紧, 屈曲

Abstract: According to the original reference design, the gravity support pedestal (GSP) of ITER toridal field magnet will be very difficult to fabricate because of large vacuum electronic welding, and therefore, two conceptual alternative designs, “split vacuum electronic welding option” and “bolt clamping option”, are put forward. The preliminary buckling analyses with FEM (finite element method) and hand calculation show that there are enough safety margin in two options and both of them are feasible. Even though the “split vacuum electronic welding option” makes the welding easier (in which GSP is split into two halves and thereby no large vacuum-chamber is needed), there are more advantages in the “bolt clamping option” (where no welding is needed), such as the GSP fabrication is simple, the reject rate is low, the cost is much lower, and the producing time is shortened. Comparably, the “bolt clamping option” is strongly recommended.

Key words: ITER gravity support, Alternative designs, Vacuum electronic welding, Bolt clamping, Buckling

中图分类号: