HL-2M等离子体对共振磁扰动线圈电流相位响应的模拟

doi:10.16568/j.0254-6086.202201011

核聚变与等离子体物理 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 63-70.DOI: 10.16568/j.0254-6086.202201011

HL-2M等离子体对共振磁扰动线圈电流相位响应的模拟

陈海涛1，郝广周*1，刘钺强2，周利娜3，陈谦1，段旭如1

(1. 核工业西南物理研究院，成都 610041；2. 美国通用原子能公司，圣地亚哥 CA 92186-5608；3. 大连海事大学，大连 116026)

收稿日期:2019-12-15 修回日期:2021-03-09 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-04-14
作者简介:陈海涛(1996-)，男，江西宁都人，硕士，从事等离子体物理研究。

Numerical calculation of plasma response to RMP for HL-2M tokamak

CHEN Hai-tao1, HAO Guang-zhou1, LIU Yue-qiang2, ZHOU Li-na3, CHEN Qian1, DUAN Xu-ru1

(1. Southwest Institute of Physics,Chengdu610041;2. General Atomic,San DiegoCA,USA, 92186-5608;3.DalianMaritime University,Dalian116026)

Received:2019-12-15 Revised:2021-03-09 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-04-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在HL-2M托卡马克平衡位形(Ip=1.0MA，β_N=1.62，q₉₅=4.01)下，使用环形单流体程序MARS-F研究了等离子体对共振磁扰动(RMP)线圈电流相位差的响应。在最优相位差时，扰动磁场显著地改变边界层磁场的拓扑，形成明显的磁岛链，增加了等离子体在边界层的输运，降低了压强梯度，减小了对ELM的驱动。模拟结果显示，扰动场环向模数为n=1时，最优的相位差约为180°；n=2时，最优的相位差约为150°；n=4时，最优的相位差约-30°。

关键词: HL-2M托卡马克, 外加扰动磁场, 等离子体共振响应

Abstract: Using the toroidal single-fluid code MARS-F, the plasma response to the phase difference of the resonance magnetic perturbation (RMP) field coil currents is studied in HL-2M equilibrium configuration (I_p=1.0MA, β_N=1.62, q₉₅=4.01). At the optimal phase difference, the perturbing magnetic field significantly changes the topology of the magnetic field in the boundary layer, forms obvious magnetic island chains, increases the transport of plasma in the layer, and reduces the pressure gradient and the drive to the ELM. The optimal phase differences are about 180°, 150° and -30° for the n=1, 2 and 4 toroidal modulus of the disturbance fields, , respectively.

Key words: HL-2M tokamak, Resonance magnetic perturbation, Plasma response

中图分类号:

TL62⁺2

陈海涛, 郝广周, 刘钺强, 周利娜, 陈谦, 段旭如. HL-2M等离子体对共振磁扰动线圈电流相位响应的模拟[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(1): 63-70.

CHEN Hai-tao, HAO Guang-zhou, LIU Yue-qiang, ZHOU Li-na, CHEN Qian, DUAN Xu-ru. Numerical calculation of plasma response to RMP for HL-2M tokamak[J]. Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics, 2022, 42(1): 63-70.

参考文献

[1] Zohm H. Edge localized modes (ELMs) [J]. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 1996, 38(2): 105.
[2] Loarte A, Saibene G, Sartori R, et al. Characteristics of type I ELM energy and particle losses in existing devices and their extrapolation to ITER [J]. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 2003, 45(9): 1549.
[3] Evans T E, Moyer R A, Thomas P R, et al. Suppression of large edge-localized modes in high-confinement DIII-D plasmas with a stochastic magnetic boundary [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92(23): 235003.
[4] Lang P T, Conway G D, Eich T, et al. ELM pace making and mitigation by pellet injection in ASDEX Upgrade [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2004, 44(5): 665077.
[5] Xiao W, Diamond P, Zou X, et al. ELM mitigation by supersonic molecular beam injection into the H-mode pedestal in the HL-2A tokamak [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2012, 52(11): 114027.
[6] Liang Y, Koslowski H R, Thomas P R, et al. Active control of type-I edge-localized modes with n=1 perturbation fields in the JET tokamak [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98(26): 265004.
[7] Team A U, Suttrop W, Eich T, et al. First observation of edge localized modes mitigation with resonant and nonresonant magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106(22): 225004.
[8] Kirk A, Harrison J, Liu Y, et al. Observation of lobes near the X point in resonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108(25): 255003.
[9] Sun Y, Jia M, Zang Q, et al. Edge localized mode control using n=1 resonant magnetic perturbation in the EAST tokamak [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2016, 57(3): 036007.
[10] Li Q. The component development status of HL-2M tokamak [J]. Fusion Engineering Design, 2015, 96(3): 38-42.
[11] Liu Y, Bondeson A, Fransson C-M, et al. Feedback stabilization of nonaxisymmetric resistive wall modes in tokamaks. I. Electromagnetic model [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2000, 7(9): 368090.
[12] Kirk A, Nardon E, Akers R, et al. Resonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST using external and internal coils for ELM control [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2010, 50(3): 034008.
[13] Kirk A, Suttrop W, Chapman I, et al. Effect of resonant magnetic perturbations on low collisionality discharges in MAST and a comparison with ASDEX Upgrade [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2015, 55(4): 043011.
[14] Zhou L, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Plasma response based RMP coil geometry optimization for an ITER plasma [J]. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 2016, 58(11): 115003.
[15] Liu Y, Ham C, Kirk A, et al. ELM control with RMP: Plasma response models and the role of edge peeling response [J]. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 2016, 58(11): 114005.
[16] Zhou L, Liu Y, Wenninger R, et al. Toroidal plasma response based ELM control coil design for EU DEMO [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2018, 58(7): 076025.
[17] Haye R J L, Fitzpatrick R, Hender T C, et al. Critical error fields for locked mode instability in tokamaks [J]. Physics of Fluids B, Plasma Physics, 1992, 4(7): 2098.
[18] Li L, Liu Y Q, Huang X, et al. Effect of large magnetic islands on screening of external magnetic perturbation fields at slow plasma flow [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2017, 24(2): 020705.
[19] 顾帅. 基于等离子体对三维场响应的共振磁扰动控制边界局域模的物理机理研究 [D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2019.
[20] Snyder P, Wilson H, Ferron J, et al. ELMs and constraints on the H-mode pedestal: peeling–ballooning stability calculation and comparison with experiment [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 2004, 44(2): 320.

HL-2M等离子体对共振磁扰动线圈电流相位响应的模拟

Numerical calculation of plasma response to RMP for HL-2M tokamak

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张小强, 鲁碧为, 刘家琴, 孙飞, 吴玉程. 偏滤器部件中W/Cu模块传热的数值模拟分析[J]. 核工业西南物理研究院, 2024, 44(2): 133-140.
[2]	陈小璐, 李鹏远, 魏海鸿, 许婉韵, 陈辉. 遥操作机械臂在托卡马克内运动轨迹的虚拟仿真研究[J]. 核工业西南物理研究院, 2024, 44(2): 191-197.
[3]	孙海岗, 靳琛垚, 张炜, 江堤, 叶孜崇. 鞘层电容对快速扫描双探针伏安曲线的影响[J]. 核工业西南物理研究院, 2024, 44(2): 198-205.
[4]	孙金鑫, 倪小军, 葛剑, 韩松博, 龚正. 等离子体大破裂工况下CFETR真空室的电磁结构耦合分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(3): 308-313.
[5]	王健, 宋云涛, 郑金星. 结构参数对高温超导电缆交流损耗影响的研究[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(3): 322-326.
[6]	陆野, 杨锦宏, 桂腾, 任珍珍, 刘胜, 宁洪伟, 徐敬坤, 宋强, 邓海飞, 汪卫华. CFETR电流爬升阶段中性束注入伏秒数分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2022, 42(3): 354-360.
[7]	杨长春, 潘皖江. ITER轴向绝缘子结构设计与分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2010, 30(3): 272-276.
[8]	王志滨，宋云涛，王忠伟，李长春，戢翔. ITER纵场磁体超导母线电磁结构分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2010, 30(2): 152-156.
[9]	邱银, 黄渊, 郑永真, 杨青巍, 崔正英, 季小全. HL-2A装置等离子体破裂实时预测系统[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2009, 29(1): 1-5.