HCSB-DEMO等离子体参数的确定与初步分析

核聚变与等离子体物理 ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 212-216.

HCSB-DEMO等离子体参数的确定与初步分析

郑国尧，冯开明

（核工业西南物理研究院，成都 610041）

收稿日期:2006-09-27 修回日期:2007-03-15 出版日期:2007-09-15 发布日期:2011-08-15
作者简介:郑国尧(1980-)，男，广东省深圳市人，硕士研究生，毕业于苏州大学。

Primary analyses of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO reactor

ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming

(Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu 610041)

Received:2006-09-27 Revised:2007-03-15 Online:2007-09-15 Published:2011-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据HCSB-DEMO堆的设计要求，对不同尺寸的聚变堆能产生的聚变功率、中子壁负载和等离子体燃烧时间等进行计算与分析，给出了符合设计要求的堆芯参数。在所选定的堆芯参数条件下进行了零维功率平衡计算分析，给出了3组HCSB-DEMO堆的等离子体初步设计参数。

关键词: 中子壁负载, 运行时间, 聚变功率, 聚变示范堆

Abstract:

Due to the requirements of HCSB-DEMO reactor design, fusion powers, neutron wall loadings and plasma burn times in the fusion reactors with different sizes are investigated. Reactor parameters are selected and analyzed with the POPCON code. Three group plasma parameters suitable for HCSB-DEMO reactor are given.

Key words: Neutron wall loading, Plasma burn time, Fusion power, HCSB-DEMO

中图分类号:

TL64+2

郑国尧，冯开明. HCSB-DEMO等离子体参数的确定与初步分析[J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2007, 27(3): 212-216.

ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming. Primary analyses of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO reactor[J]. NUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS, 2007, 27(3): 212-216.

参考文献

[1] Strebkov Yu. RF definition of DEMO reactor and strate- gy [R]. Test Blanket Working Group Meeting (TBWG- 12) Naka, Japan, Mach 10-11, 2004.

[2] Boccaccini L V. DEMO development strategy in EU [R] Test Blanket Working Group Meeting (TBWG-12) Naka, Japan, Mach 10-11, 2004.

[3] Akiba M. DEMO definition of Japan [R]. Test Blanket Working Group Meeting (TBWG-12) Naka, Japan, Mach 10-11, 2004.

[4] Hiwatari R, Okano K, Asaoka Y,et al. Demonstration tokamak fusion power plant for early realization of net electric power generation [R]. Vienna: IAEA, 2005.

[5] PAN Chuanhong. Definition of DEMO reactor and DEMO development strategy in CH [R] Test Blanket Working Group Meeting (TBWG-12) Naka, Japan, Mach 10-11, 2004.

[6] 盛光昭. STR参数分析研究 [R]. 成都：核工业西南物理研究院, 1994.

[7] Stacey W M. Tokamak demonstration reactors [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 1995, 35: 11.

[8] ITER Physics Basis Editors, ITER Physics Expert Group Chairs and Co-Chairs, ITER Joint Central Team and Physics Integration Unit.Chapter 1: Overview and sum- mary [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 1999, 39(12): 2137.

[9] ITER Physics Expert Group on Disruptions, Plasma Co- ntrol and MHD, ITER Physics Basis Editors. Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions [J]. Nucl. Fusion, 1999, 39(12): 2251.

[10] Clement Wong. General atomics system study of super- conducting coils fusion devices at different aspect ratios [Z]. Private letter，2005.

[11] ITER Technical Basis. Plasma performance assessment [R]. 2004.

[12] Oomens A A M. 先进托卡马克概念和堆设计 [J]. 国外核聚变, 2003, 1: 8.

[13] Lackner K. 改进约束状态与聚变堆要求的相容性 [J]. 国外核聚变, 1998, 6: 41.

[14] 石秉仁. 环径比接近2的托卡马克堆芯等离子体特征 [J]. 核聚变与等离子体物理, 2003, 23(3): 129.

[15] Sokolov Yu A. Russian DEMO plant study [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 1998, 41: 525-533.

[16] David Maisonnier. DEMO and fusion power plant conc- epttual studies in Europe [J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2006, 81: 1123-1130.